Skip to main content

About your Search

20120925
20121003
STATION
WHUT (Howard University Television) 2
LANGUAGE
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2
WHUT
Oct 3, 2012 6:00pm EDT
candidate for president runs against jimmy carter and ronald reagan. president jimmy carter absolutely opposed john anderson's participation, and the league had a choice. do they support the independent candidate's participation or do they capitulate to the demands of jimmy carter? the league did the right thing, they stood up for the united states and invited john anderson. passed for four years later. the walter mondale and ronald reagan campaign's vetoed 80 of the moderator that the league of women voters have proposed for the debates. never try to get rid of difficult questions. 8-0. 80. the league then held a press conference and lambast the campaigns for trying to get rid of the difficult questions. of course there was an outcry. the result was fantastic. for the next debate, the campaign were required to accept the lead's moderators. four more years later and you have the michael this caucus and george bush campaign's drafting the first ever 12-page secret debate contract. they gave it to the league of women voters and said implement this. they said, are you kidding m
WHUT
Sep 25, 2012 6:00pm EDT
"amnesty" in this country came under the most conservative president in our lifetime -- ronald reagan. he approved or signed into law the simpson bill that provided the opportunity for about 3 million people who were then in the country undocumented to legalize their status. we're talking about 11 million to 12 the people now that are undocumented in the united states. i think the extreme -- the most extreme right of the republican party understands that if 11 million to 12 million people are able to legalize their status and become voters, it will change the political landscape of america for decades to come. they understand it could spell doom of the republican party for a generation to come. and i think that is why they're struggling so much against it, just as they did back in 1986 with the first comprehensive immigration reform. i think there is a political reason for this the vehement opposition to basically adjusting the status for folks there really for the most part are not criminals, are hard- working people. they were forced to, by a variety of reasons, to leave their countries
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2